Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wilson v. Santana et al
as 3:2023cv00250
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Wilson
Defendant:
J. Santana, E. Frijas, M. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Bradford v. Usher, et al
as 21-16253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
USHER, RIMBACH, GERMAN and others
Defendant:
C. OGBUEHI
Kevin Allen v. S. Rimbach, et al
as 21-15203
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, LOPEZ, S. RIMBACH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN ALLEN
Raymond Bradford v. USDC-CAFR
as 20-73686
Not Classified By Court:
USHER, ULIT, Dr., GERMAN and others
Petitioner:
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
(PC) Hill v. Pfeifer et al
as 1:2019cv01221
Defendant:
K Cater, C. Pfeifer, B. Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Taft L Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Pfeiffer, et al.
as 1:2019cv00437
Defendant:
S.K. Hemenway, Trotter, J. Bermudez and others
Plaintiff:
Jarmaal Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Allen v. Rimbach et al
as 1:2018cv01653
Defendant:
Pfeiffer, D. Tayson, Hanzak and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Etuate Sekona v. Zepp et al
as 1:2018cv01065
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, S. Rimbach, K. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Etuate Sekona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald York v. M. Stewart, et al
as 18-15749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD RAY YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
M. STEWART, Correctional Lieutenant at Kern Valley State Prison, G. GARCIA, Correctional Sergeant at Kern Valley State Prison, J. NEIGHBORS, Correctional Sergeant at Kern Valley State Prison and others
Reginald York v. M. Biter, et al
as 17-15090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD RAY YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden, C. PFEIFFER, S. RIMBACH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
