Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cantu v. City of Ft. Worth Police N.W. Division
as 4:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Cantu
Defendant:
City of Ft. Worth Police N.W. Division, City of Ft. Worth Human Resources/Risk Management and City of Ft. Worth Police Dept. N.W. Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Nunu v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2021cv00128
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, Honorable Michael B. Newman, Nancy Nunu Risk and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Nunu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brewster v. AVA Risk Group Limited
as 4:2020cv01967
Plaintiff:
Michael Brewster
Defendant:
AVA Risk Group Limited and AVA Risk Group Limited doing business as Future Fibre Technologies, US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02815
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman et al v. Brannan et al
as 2:2015cv01507
Plaintiff:
Jan Rogers Freeman , Jennifer Page Scoggins, Laurie Lynn Caves and others
Defendant:
Ryan Brannan, Ken Paxton, JI Specialty Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
