Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jackson v. RJ Donovan
as 3:2023cv01826
Plaintiff:
Tyiavory Jackson
Defendant:
RJ Donovan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kjeldergaard v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Gordon Kjeldergaard
Defendant:
CDCR, Office of Appeals and RJ Donovan Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lena v. RJ Donovan's Entire Prison Administration/Personelle et al
as 3:2021cv00513
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lena
Defendant:
L. Acosta and RJ Donovan's Entire Prison Administration/Personelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Navarro et al
as 3:2018cv01964
Defendant:
O. Navarro, E. Ramirez, E. Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lena v. Coley et al
as 3:2018cv01570
Defendant:
Warden William Paramo, Xavier Beccera, People of the State of California at "RJ Donovan State Prison's Receiving and Release" and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Lena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Fields v. RJ Donovan Correctional Facility
as 3:2016cv01318
Plaintiff:
Carlton Fields
Defendant:
RJ Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Andres Romo v. RJ Donovan Warden et al
as 8:2016cv00525
Respondent:
Paramo and RJ Donovan Warden
Petitioner:
Andres Romo
Kane v. RJ Donovan State Prison
as 3:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elias Kane
Defendant:
RJ Donovan State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. All Wasco, Folsom and RJ Donovan Administrative Personel et al
as 3:2015cv01481
Plaintiff:
Seth Hernandez
Defendant:
All Wasco, Folsom and RJ Donovan Administrative Personel, Superior Court Contestants #1291722, Personel of Calif. Dept. of Corr. and Reh. Admin. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meador v. Florez et al
as 3:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
Gordon Meador
Defendant:
Florez, R&R Supervisor and RJ Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
