Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Salmen v. RJDCF Warden
as 24-454
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN SALMEN
Respondent / Appellee:
RJDCF WARDEN
Lopez v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Daniel Steven Lopez
Defendant:
Hernandez, C.D.C.R. and RJDCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Salmen v. RJDCF Warden
as 2:2021cv08652
Petitioner:
Justin Salmen
Respondent:
RJDCF Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig Garrett v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 21-56004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG KAISER GARRETT
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of Corrections for CDCR, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden, RJDCF, PATRICK COVELLO, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Bamber v. Paramo
as 5:2019cv01599
Petitioner:
Robert Roy Bamber
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitations and Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (RJDCF)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Karl Russell v. Richard Lopez, et al
as 18-55971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL JOSEPH RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD LOPEZ, Correctional Officer, CDCR-RJDCF and BILL STRONG, Correctional Officer, CDCR-RJDCF
Ivory Phillips v. Gerald Janda, et al
as 13-57028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVORY J. PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD J. JANDA, Warden, RALPH M. DIAZ, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden and others
Virgel Williams vs. James Hargreaves et.al.
as 3:2013cv02797
Plaintiff:
Virgel Williams
Defendant:
J. Hargreaves, A. Denbala, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (RJDCF) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Paramo
as 3:2013cv02261
Plaintiff:
Kyle Avery
Defendant:
D. Paramo, Frank Ruffino, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgel Williams vs. James Hargreaves et.al.
as 4:2013cv03465
Plaintiff:
Virgel Williams
Defendant:
J. Hargreaves, A. Denbala, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (RJDCF) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
