Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
RLI Insurance Co. et al v. Mallory Alexander International Logistics, LLC
as 1:2023cv10931
Plaintiff: RLI Insurance Co., Great American Insurance Co., Starnet Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Mallory Alexander International Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
RLI Insurance Co et al
as 1:2023cv08607
Plaintiff: RLI Insurance Co and Transworld International Trading
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
RLI Insurance Co et al v. Maersk A/S
as 1:2023cv08608
Plaintiff: RLI Insurance Co and Transworld International Trading
Defendant: MAERSK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America, et al v. M/V One Apus, et al
as 1:2022cv08233
Plaintiff: Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company Of America,, Affliated FM Insurance Company, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty and others
Defendant: One, BDP Transport Inc., HMM and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Danmar Lines
Cross Claimant: Transpac Cargoline, New Chain Logistics Co Ltd, Samsung SDS Co Ltd and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: M/V ONE APUS, IMO no. 9806079, including its engines, boilers, tackle, and other appurtenances, etc., in rem
Cross Defendant: Roes 1-10
3Rd Party Defendant: Orient Overseas Container Line, M/V One Apus in rem, ECU Worldwide and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Marine Cargo Loss or Damage - Liability of Water Carriers
VAFOKULOVA v. UA INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING, CORP. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02605
Plaintiff: AZIZA VAFOKULOVA
Defendant: UA INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING, CORP. , ARTHUR WILLIAMS , SUNTECK TRANSPORT CO., INC. and others
Cross_claimant: SUNTECK TRANSPORT CO., INC.
Cross_defendant: NEW PRIME, INC. , PRESPERSE CORPORATION , UA INTERNATIONAL CONSULTING, CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint et al v. Prime Construction Co. of NY, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07176
Plaintiff: Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint, Bricklayers Local 1, International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craft Workers, and Bricklayers Labor Management Relations Committee and Jeremiah Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant: Prime Construction Co. of NY, Inc., Pro-Metal Construction, Inc., Ashfaq Proya and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Sullivan et al v. Prime Construction Co. of NY, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06396
Plaintiff: Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant: Endurance American Insurance Co., John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary, Prime Construction Co. of NY, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Sullivan et al v. M&S General Construction et al
as 1:2012cv02089
Plaintiff: Bricklayers Joint Apprentice Training Fund, Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant: John and Jane Doe, M&S General Construction, RLI Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Moore et al v. RLI Insurance Co. et al
as 2:2011cv00799
Plaintiff: Junice N. Moore , Eric S. Gardner and Judy A. Richardson
Defendant: RLI Insurance Co. , Southwest Freight, Inc. and Danny A. Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-40418
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?