Cases 1 - 10 of 38
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2023cv00591
Petitioner:
ROBERT EMERSON SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SMITH-EL BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, MS. M. SHEFFIELD, RONNIE FILEDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, RONNIE FIELDS, MS. BONNIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. RODRIGUEZ
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
CORPORAL RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL, BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL, BEY and ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, MS. CHRISTMAS, MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER/JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00600
Plaintiff:
Robert Damion Smith
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
East Coast Right of Way Maintenance, Inc. et al v. United Bank
as 1:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
Robert William Smith and East Coast Right of Way Maintenance, Inc.
Defendant:
United Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. LOVEJOY et al
as 1:2019cv00057
Defendant:
THOMAS FAGERLI, JASON CRUMP, OFFICER LOVEJOY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. HOOK
as 1:2017cv00469
Petitioner:
ROBERT WAYNE SMITH
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
