Cases 1 - 8 of 8
WILBUR v. FITZPATRICK et al
as 1:2018cv00255
Defendant:
HAROLD ABBOTT, TERRY SCOTT DRAKE, DAVID ALLEN and others
Undetermined:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Plaintiff:
JAMES SCOTT WILBUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fournier v. LePage, et al
as 15-2027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK D. FOURNIER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL LEPAGE, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH PONTE, individually and in his official capacity and others
Fournier v. LePage, et al
as 14-8055
Petitioner:
FRANK D. FOURNIER
Respondent:
PAUL LEPAGE, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH PONTE, individually and in his official capacity and others
FOURNIER v. LEPAGE et al
as 1:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
FRANK DANIEL FOURNIER
Defendant:
PAUL LEPAGE, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, JOSEPH PONTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leavitt v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 10-1432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND D. LEAVITT
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC, TODD TRITCH, MATTHEW TURNER and others
Defendant:
MARTIN A. MAGNUSSON, JEFFREY MERRILL, ROBERT COSTIGAN and others
LONG TIMERS GROUP INC et al v. CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2008cv00305
Plaintiff:
NADIM HAQUE and TYSON ANDREWS
Defendant:
ME COMMN CORRECTIONS , MAINE STATE PRISON, WARDEN , MAINE STATE PRISON, DEPUTY WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rollins v. Magnusson, et al
as 08-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D ROLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN A. MAGNUSSON, JEFFREY MERRILL, ROBERT COSTIGAN and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
:
COLE v. CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J COLE and ARTHUR BELANGER
Defendant:
MARTIN A MAGNUSSON , JEFFREY MERRILL , HEIDI ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
