Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2020cv00831
Defendant:
Galipeau, Robert D Bugher and R Nash
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schrock v. Romero et al
as 3:2019cv00629
Defendant:
Robert D Bugher, Leonard, B Romero and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Schrock, Jr
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYFIELD v. WIRE et al
as 2:2019cv00335
Defendant:
JANE DOE, QUENTIN STORM, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON MAYFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON BEY v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2019cv01977
Defendant:
M. TRUEX, GEO GROUP INC, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. SINGLETON BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON BEY v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2019cv01877
Defendant:
M. TRUEX, GEO GROUP INC, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. SINGLETON BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVENPORT v. BURROWS et al
as 1:2018cv01125
Defendant:
ROBERT D. BUGHER, L. BURROWS, J. LYTTLE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAVENPORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNETT v. NEAL et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
DEBBIE ABRAM, PAM BANE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. GIBSON et al
as 1:2017cv04238
Defendant:
ROBERT D. BUGHER, GIBSON and E. SHELLY
Plaintiff:
LANCE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reymond Barnett v. Robert Bugher, et al
as 17-3296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REYMOND BARNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT D. BUGHER, STANLEY KNIGHT, CHARLES A. PENFOLD and others
BARNETT v. NEESE et al
as 2:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
REYMOND BARNETT
Defendant:
ROBERT D. BUGHER, CAMPBELL, R. GAGNON and others
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
