Cases 11 - 20 of 51
MCCROMMON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv00121
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND, ROBERT D. GILMORE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
SHANE LENELL MCCROMMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RILEY v. GILMORE
as 2:2019cv00348
Petitioner:
DANIEL RILEY
Respondent:
ROBERT D. GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LAWRENCE MAHALLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01685
Defendant:
DR. LUCAS MALISHCHAK, JOHN BURT, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WASHINGTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01390
Defendant:
C.O. STEFFIN, SGT. CHESMER, LT. JELLOT and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEWSOME v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00317
Defendant:
CARTER, JOHN WETZEL, Lt. JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
BRAKEER NEWSOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. HOUSE et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
BYUNGHAK JIN, T. POZIVIAK, M. OPPMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00850
Plaintiff:
OMAR JACKSON
Defendant:
MICHELE BAKER, BRIDGETTE WRIGHT, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Talley v. Wetzel, et al
as 3:2018cv00992
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Rodney Chism, David Link and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Attorney General's Office, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. WETZEL, et al
as 2:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, RODNEY CHISM, DAVID LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
