Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cheek et al v. GL NV24 Shipping, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Southbound Expeditions, LLC, Timothy Cheek, Scott Owens and others
Defendant:
GL NV24 Shipping, Inc., Hyundai Glovis Co., G-Marine Service Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Davis v. State of Georgia et al
as 3:2022cv00126
Petitioner:
Robert Davis
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and Warden Jacob Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02875
Petitioner:
Robert Davis
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and Warden Jacob Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STOVALL v. STORACE et al
as 1:2021cv01783
Defendant:
ROBERT DAVIS III and CHELISE STORACE
Plaintiff:
Carla Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOVALL v. STORACE et al
as 1:2020cv00186
Defendant:
ROBERT DAVIS III and CHELISE STORACE
Plaintiff:
CARLA STOVALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grier v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02643
Plaintiff:
Amy Grier
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Robert Davis and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS v. ONEAL et al
as 5:2016cv00183
Plaintiff:
CEDRICK ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant:
ROBERT ONEAL, PURVIS, WORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 4:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Shaunte Davis and Robert Davis
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Sandy Springs, Georgia et al
as 5:2008cv00437
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis White
Defendant:
Sandy Springs, Georgia and Doraville City Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
