Cases 81 - 90 of 358
BRADY v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01507
Plaintiff:
NATHAN BRADY
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, DAVID LIEBEL, DUSHAN ZATECKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, T. PHEGLEY and T. HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derek Boyd v. Robert Carter, Jr., et al
as 22-2294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEREK L. BOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., KRISTEN DAUSS, Doctor, ANGELA REAVES and others
SCRUGGS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01369
Plaintiff:
KEITH SCRUGGS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLEMON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01307
Plaintiff:
MANUEL CLEMON
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENLEE v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREENLEE
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, FRANK VANIHEL, SHELBY CRICHFIED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIBBS, PINKSTON, HARISTON, TOWNSEND, JONES v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01245
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TIBBS, GERALD PINKSTON, MARK HARISTON and others
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
CAMERON THOMAS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
CAMERON THOMAS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
