Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robert Dillon v. Correction Corporation of America, et al
as 22-16152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J. DILLON
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, DAMON HININGER, CEO, Core Civic Inc., NEVADA SOUTHERN DETENTION CENTER and others
Robert Dillon v. Luis Rosa, et al
as 22-16031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT J. DILLON
Defendant / Appellee:
LUIS ROSA, substituted in for Brian Koehn [53], MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director, M. JEFFERSON, US Marshal Service and others
Dillon v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2020cv02319
Defendant:
Mr. Kutz, Mrs. Bonnie Holley, Mrs. Laurer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon et al v. Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC) et al
as 2:2020cv01475
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Dillon and Marvin L Dillon
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Warden Brian Koehn, M. Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon et al v. Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC) et al
as 2:2020cv01436
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Dillon and Robert J. Dillon
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Core Civic, Correction Corp of America (NSDC), M. Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Dillon v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 11-14866
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT J. DILLON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Robert Dillon v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 11-14232
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT J. DILLON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
DILLON v. MCNEIL
as 4:2010cv00022
Petitioner:
ROBERT J DILLON
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeNardo v. Owens et al
as 3:2007cv00142
Plaintiff:
Daniel DeNardo
Defendant:
Thomas Owens, Tenys B. Owens, Mark Begich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
