Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. James et al
as 1:2022cv03194
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rachel James, Jamelle D James, as independent administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr., Jamelle D James, individually and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
JAMES et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JAMES, JR. and SHIRLEY V. JAMES
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC , STANDARD GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY and PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAMES v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv59880
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JAMES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
James v. Jackson Pierce Public Affairs Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv21130
Plaintiff:
Robert L James
Defendant:
Jackson Pierce Public Affairs Inc. and Edna L Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
LAWTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2009cv02756
Plaintiff:
STEPHON LAWTON
Defendant:
DANIEL MITCHELL, JR., NORTHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, FRANKIE LANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ROTHMAN v. CITY OF NORTHFIELD et al
as 1:2009cv01877
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROTHMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTHFIELD, ROBERT L. JAMES, MARTIN PEARY and others
Cross Claimant:
CITY OF NORTHFIELD, ROBERT L. JAMES and MARTIN PEARY
Cross Defendant:
NORTHFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, NORTHFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, RICHARD STEPURA and others
Counter Claimant:
CITY OF NORTHFIELD, ROBERT L. JAMES and MARTIN PEARY
Counter Defendant:
NORTHFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, NORTHFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, RICHARD STEPURA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JAMES v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60955
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JAMES, ROBERT L. JAMES, ROBERT L. JAMES and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
