Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robert Marr, et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00693
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Johnson & Johnson Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Marr and Rodney Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Marr v. Director TDCJ ID
as 4:2007cv00543
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 4:2007cv00331
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Director
as 4:2007cv00332
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Respondent:
TDCJ-ID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 4:2007cv00333
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 4:2007cv00318
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 4:2007cv00320
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 4:2007cv00321
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 4:2007cv00319
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marr v. Director TDCJ-ID
as 4:2007cv00322
Petitioner:
Donald Robert Marr
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
