Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MOTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23332
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MOTE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dale Hurick v. Kenneth McKee, et al
as 17-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE ALLEN HURICK
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH T. MCKEE, Warden and ROBERT MOTE, Resident Unit Manager
Paul Bergeron v. Tony Trierweiler, et al
as 17-1104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL A. BERGERON
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY TRIERWEILER, Warden, Warden, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Step-3 Grievance Coordinator - Manager, J. DAVIDS, Deputy Warden and others
Christopher Bey v. Thomas Finco, et al
as 16-2373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS G. FINCO, Deputy Director, ROBERT MOTE, MATT MACAULEY, Deputy Warden and others
Richards #641715 v. Snyder et al
as 1:2014cv00299
Plaintiff:
Kyle B. Richards #641715
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Brian Calley, Mark Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards #641715 et al v. Debhour et al
as 1:2014cv00239
Plaintiff:
Kyle B. Richards #641715, Laron Glenn #373892 and Terrio Bruce #622008
Defendant:
Stephen Debhour, Thomas Combs, Rick Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards et al v. Debhour et al
as 2:2014cv10698
Plaintiff:
Kyle Richards, La'ron Glenn and Terrio Bruce
Defendant:
Stephen Debhour, Thomas Combs, Rick Snyder and others
Johnson #778878 v. Mote et al
as 1:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Westley Johnson #778878
Defendant:
Robert Mote, Thomas Finco, Marcus Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Snyder et al
as 2:2013cv14386
Plaintiff:
Kyle Richards
Defendant:
Richard Snyder, Ken McKee, Bill Schuette and others
White v. McKee et al
as 2:2013cv13254
Plaintiff:
Sean White
Defendant:
Kenneth McKee, Doug Welton, Matt MaCauley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
