Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roberto Perez, Jr. v. Bryan Collier, et al
as 20-20036
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIJ RAMADAN, correctional officer, AMBER TAYLOR, correctional officer, JIM PITCOCK, correctional officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO PEREZ, JR.
Perez v. Cateo et al
as 6:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffery W. Cateo, Jeffery S. Richardson, William J. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberto Perez, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-41376
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERTO PEREZ, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Roberto Perez, Jr. v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-40661
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERTO PEREZ, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Perez, Jr. v. Livingston et al
as 4:2016cv00306
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Jane Doe and Jane Doe II
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Rupert
as 2:2015cv00352
Petitioner:
Roberto Perez, Jr.
Respondent:
John A Rupert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Thaler
as 6:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez, Jr
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, John A Rupert, Larry G Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Rupert et al
as 6:2015cv00368
Defendant:
John Rupert, Vickie Barrow, Gaye Karriker and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberto Perez, Jr. v. Eddie Williams, et al
as 10-10629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERTO PEREZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE C. WILLIAMS, TOMMY L. NORWOOD, FRANKIE L. HAYNES and others
Perez v. Williams et al
as 7:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
Eddie C. Williams, Tommy L Norwood, Frankie L. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.