Cases 11 - 20 of 32
JENKINS et al vs. ALMY et al
as 2:2017cv00366
Plaintiff:
JULIE A JENKINS , ALISON JG BATES , STEPHANIE L SMALL and others
Defendant:
R CHRISTOPHER ALMY , STEPHANIE P ANDERSON , TODD COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JONATHAN SMITH, EARL SAUNDERS, CHARLES HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY S ROBINSON
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY and DENNIS SHIPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. CASAVANT et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
JANE AND JOHN DOE'S, DONALD MARDEN, JOSHUA ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TRACY v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
PAUL DAVID TRACY
Respondent:
MICHAELA MURPHY, NORMAN CROTEAU and ANDREW ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBINSON et al v. HENDERSHOT et al
as 2:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
DAVID E ROBINSON and F WILLIAM MESSIER
Defendant:
JOLINE P HENDERSHOT , JASON S ROGERS and PATRICK FRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
MESSIER et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE et al
as 2:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
F WILLIAM MESSIER, DAVID E ROBINSON, MAINE REPUBLIC FREE STATE and others
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE , DOUGLAS H SHULMAN , INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
ROBINSON v. COHEN
as 1:2012cv00294
Petitioner:
VINCENT LEE ROBINSON
Respondent:
G COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
VINCENT LEE ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHN E MORRIS, PAUL R LEPAGE and MAINE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. MILLER et al
as 2:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
DAVID J ROBINSON
Defendant:
JO MILLER and HERBERT A MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
