Cases 31 - 40 of 223
STALEY v. AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03664
Plaintiff:
JEROME STALEY
Defendant:
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC, JAMES GREGORY and KIMBERLY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ROBINSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Oscar Robinson
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Police Officer Eric Clark, Police Officer Redmond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Fetterman et al
as 3:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Lormil Woodny and others
Defendant:
John Fetterman, Elena Cross, Will Danowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAN BUREN et al v. ABRAXAS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
TOBIAS VAN BUREN, JAYDEN ROBINSON, CAMERON JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ABRAXAS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, CORNELL ABRAXAS GROUP, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wassel v. Torbeck et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Wassel, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Richard Torbeck, Gregory H. Chelak, Raymond J. Tonkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City of Shamokin, PA et al
as 4:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Robinson
Defendant:
City of Shamokin, PA, Northumberland County, John Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
