Cases 21 - 30 of 34
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re:
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rochester Drug Cooperative, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as VAE/2:18-cv-00071
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Cooperative, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Intervenor:
UCFW Local 1500 Welfare Fund and Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Allergan, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00970
Defendant:
Allergan, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Cooperative, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Rochester Drug Cooperative, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Cooperative, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. , Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Intervenor:
UCFW Local 1500 Welfare Fund and Philadelphia Federation of Teachers Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018md02819
Defendant:
Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Allergan, Inc., 1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU Licensed Practical Nurses Welfare Fund and others
In Re:
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Petitioner:
Akorn Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC. v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2018cv00303
Defendant:
JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC.
In Re:
REMICADE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent:
NATIONAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH PLAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rochester Drug Cooperative Inc v. Goodheart Pharmacy Inc, et al
as 16-4271
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE INC
Defendant - Appellant:
GOODHEART PHARMACY INC, OBIOMA AGOUCHA and DAMIEN AGOUCHA
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE INC. v. GOODHEART PHARMACY, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2016cv01787
Plaintiff:
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE INC.
Defendant:
GOODHEART PHARMACY, INCORPORATED, OBIOMA AGOUCHA and DAMIEN AGOUCHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Modafinil AntiTrust, et al, et al
as 15-3475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J M SMITH CORP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CEPHALON INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MYLAN LABORATORIES INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC. v. CONFIDENTIAL PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv02259
Plaintiff:
ROCHESTER DRUG COOPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
CONFIDENTIAL PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, LLC and JEFFREY L. DERSHEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
