Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ouellette v. Beaupre, et al
as 21-1135
Interested Party:
MOLLY LOVELL-KEELY, MAINELY MEDIA LLC and BENJAMIN MEIKLEJOHN
Defendant:
NORMAN GAUDETTE
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER BEAUPRE, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department and in his individual capacity and BIDDEFORD, ME
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAWRENCE ROLAND OUELLETTE
Frechette v. Beaupre, et al
as 19-2203
Defendant:
NORMAN GAUDETTE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT FRECHETTE
Defendant / Appellee:
BIDDEFORD, ME and ROGER BEAUPRE, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department
Ouellette v. Beaupre, et al
as 19-2069
Interested Party:
MOLLY LOVELL-KEELY, MAINELY MEDIA LLC and BENJAMIN MEIKLEJOHN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE R. OUELLETTE
Defendant / Appellee:
BIDDEFORD, ME and ROGER BEAUPRE, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department and in his individual capacity
Defendant:
NORMAN GAUDETTE
Lauzon v. Beaupre, et al
as 19-1968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW LAUZON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER BEAUPRE, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department and BIDDEFORD, ME
Defendant:
STEPHEN DODD
FRECHETTE v. GAUDETTE et al
as 2:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FRECHETTE
Defendant:
NORMAN GAUDETTE , ROGER BEAUPRE and CITY OF BIDDEFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIRARD v. DODD et al
as 2:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
BERTRAND GIRARD
Defendant:
STEPHEN DODD, ROGER BEAUPRE and CITY OF BIDDEFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OUELLETTE v. GAUDETTE et al
as 2:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ROLAND OUELLETTE
Defendant:
NORMAN GAUDETTE , ROGER BEAUPRE and CITY OF BIDDEFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUZON v. DODD et al
as 2:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LAUZON
Defendant:
STEPHEN DODD , ROGER BEAUPRE and CITY OF BIDDEFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
