Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Salahuddin v. Davis et al
as 7:2025cv03216
Petitioner:
Ex Rel. Brenda Salahuddin
Respondent:
Roland L. Davis in their official and personal capacity doing business as United States Marshal Service, Victoria L. Kuhn in their official and personal capacity doing business as NJDOC Commissioner, Pam Bondi in their official and personal capacity doing business as US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Salahuddin v. Davis et al
as 7:2025cv03215
Petitioner:
Ex Rel. Brenda Salahuddin
Respondent:
Roland L. Davis in their official and personal capacity doing business as United States Marshal Service, William Lothrop in their official and personal capacity doing business as Federal Bureau of Prisons Commissioner and Pam Bondi in their official and personal capacity doing business as Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21271
Plaintiff:
Ada E. Davis and Roland A. Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58290
Plaintiff:
ROLAND J DAVIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Davis v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 6:2010cv01310
Plaintiff:
Roland L. Davis
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Davis v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary
as 2:2010cv00107
Petitioner:
Roland T. Davis
Respondent:
Warden Ohio State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Harms v. Seal-It, LLC et al
as 6:2007cv00582
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Harms
Defendant:
Seal-It, LLC and Roland L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
