Cases 1 - 10 of 676
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Bank of New York Mellon v. Gutierrez et al
as 9:2024cv80500
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Maria C. Gutierrez, Danyil Holosenko, Roman Moskalenko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Foreclosure
Raymond Gill v. Jennifer Broton, et al
as 24-11236
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BROTON, AVERY, B. PAVIGLIQNTI and others
Roman v. Convergint Technologies LLC
as 8:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Roman
Defendant:
Convergint Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Roman v. Convergint Technologies LLC
as 6:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Roman
Defendant:
Convergint Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gill v. Broton et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer A. Broton, Assistant Warden Avery, B. Pavigliqnti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Roman v. Amazon Inc.
as 8:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Roman
Defendant:
Amazon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
TATE v. GEORGIA
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
ELBERT ROMAN TATE
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN BRIAN CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel Golden, et al v. Mercury Auto Transport LLC, et al
as 24-10530
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL GOLDEN, FRANCO ROMAN and CHARLES STEEVES
Defendant:
MERCURY AUTO TRANSPORT LLC and MATTHEW D. SANDOMIR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
