Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03852
Plaintiff:
ROMEL ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Anthony v. Fisher et al
as 1:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Romel Damon Anthony
Defendant:
R. Fisher, R. Thompson, D. Betz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BOWERS v. LOVELL
as 2:2022cv04323
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOWERS
Defendant:
DAMON ROMEL LOVELL
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DIXON et al v. WASHINGTON et al
as 2:2018cv02838
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN JEFFERS, JOHN TWYMAN, VALERIE WEAVER and others
Defendant:
REV. EDWARD C. LILLY, ERIC WASHINGTON, JOSEPH HOLLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
WASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. RNN ENTERTAINMENT INC et al
as 2:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Defendant:
RNN ENTERTAINMENT INC, ROMEL MARCUS, DERRICK ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Thompson v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2015cv00380
Petitioner:
Romell Thompson
Respondent:
Tammy Ferguson and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAUMAN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04576
Plaintiff:
LEDDURE RASHAD BAUMAN , VERONICA BAUMAN , JOHN W. BEASLEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COACH, INC. et al v. ROMEL COSMETICS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03704
Plaintiff:
COACH, INC. and COACH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
ROMEL COSMETICS, INC. and ADRIENNE RUTH RESNICK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
WARD v. MC GOWAN
as 2:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
ROMELLE ADAMS WARD
Defendant:
JOSEPH MC GOWAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
