Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Winffel v. Barnes et al
as 2:2010cv01709
Plaintiff:
Alberto Winffel
Defendant:
Ronald Barnes and A. Pomazal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aous Jarrar v. Ronald Barne
as 10-15198
Petitioner - Appellant:
AOUS JARRAR
Respondent - Appellee:
RONALD BARNES, Warden
Dongell Lawrence Finney LLP v. Prozone International Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06661
Plaintiff:
Dongell Lawrence Finney LLP and Dongell Lawrence Finney LLP
Defendant:
Prozone International Inc., Visionic Inc., Econzone Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jarrar v Barnes
as 2:2009cv01684
Petitioner:
Aous Jarrar
Defendant:
Ronald Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jarrar
as 2:2009at00957
Petitioner:
Aous Z. Jarrar
Defendant:
Ronald Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Barnes et al v. Acands, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv04944
Plaintiff:
Patricia Barnes, Patricia Barnes, Patricia Barnes and others
Defendant:
Acands, Inc., American Asbestos Company, Bayer Cropscience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harless v. Campbell, et. al.
as 2:2007cv00600
Plaintiff:
Ben V. Harless
Defendant:
Roseanne Campbell, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of Community Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granger v. Campbell, et. al.
as 2:2007cv00602
Plaintiff:
Andrew L. Granger
Defendant:
Roseanne Campbell, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of Community Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2004cv03339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
