Cases 1 - 10 of 18
CHAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01441
Defendant:
WETZEL, DIRECTOR OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICE UNIT, S.C.I. WAYMART, U.M. KAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHAVIS and RONALD CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Chavis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 15-3804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Ronald Chavis v. Superintendent Mercer SCI, et al
as 15-3522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2015cv04832
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ronald Chavis v. Warden Curran Fromhold Correct, et al
as 15-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06757
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVIS v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2013cv04039
Petitioner:
RONALD CHAVIS
Respondent:
JOHN P. DELANEY and JOHN W. GOLDSBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CHAVIS v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2013cv03532
Petitioner:
RONALD CHAVIS
Respondent:
JOHN P. DELANEY, WARDEN/DETENTION CENTER, D.A. OF PHILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2013cv02176
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Chavis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-1556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
