Cases 11 - 20 of 21
CHAVIS v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2013cv03532
Petitioner:
RONALD CHAVIS
Respondent:
JOHN P. DELANEY, WARDEN/DETENTION CENTER, D.A. OF PHILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2013cv02176
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN P. DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Chavis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-1556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
BATTS et al v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT A. BATTS, CHAL KENNEDY, MICHAEL MCCRAY and others
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv05642
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Chavis v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 12-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Chavis v. City of Phila, et al
as 11-4233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CLERK OF COURT FOR CITY OF PHILA, COLEMAN and others
Chavis v. City of Phila, et al
as 11-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DA PHILADELPHIA, DEFENDERS ASSOC OF PHILA and others
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2011cv04556
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, D.A. OF PHILA., DEFENDERS ASSOC. OF PHILA. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Chavis v. Commonwealth of PA
as 11-1248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
