Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Woods et al v. SAMUEL et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Lead Plaintiff:
Louise Woods
Plaintiff:
Tyhara Woods, CHARLES SCOTT, Z.S. A Minor and others
Defendant:
EARL SAMUEL, RONALD HENRY, KELVIN JEREMIAH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROBINSON et al v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
HOWARD ROBINSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, KELVIN A. JEREMIAH, JANEA JORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald et al v. Philadelphia Housing Authority et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Vanessa McDonald, Jeffrey White, Estelle McDonald and others
Administrator:
Beverly Graham
Defendant:
Philadelphia Housing Authority, KELVIN A. JEREMIAH, Janea Jordon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Woods et al v. Authority et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
LOUISE WOODS, TYHARA WOODS, CHARLES SCOTT and others
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, EARL SAMUEL, RONALD HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HENRY v. MARLETTE FUNDING, LLC
as 2:2021cv00985
Plaintiff:
RONALD HENRY
Defendant:
MARLETTE FUNDING, LLC doing business as BEST EGG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Armenti v. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education et al
as 1:2012cv02039
Plaintiff:
Angelo Armenti, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education , The Board of Governors of the State System of Higher Education , Ron Tomalis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
