Cases 1 - 10 of 37
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, ANTHONY TILLMAN, MICHAEL FIGUEROA and others
Defendant:
LAUREL R. HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, S. SHAFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON et al v. LAUREL et al
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, RYSHAWN CRAWFORD and THOMAS W. MCCUNE
Defendant:
HARRY LAUREL, GEORGE LITTLE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN and ROSS P. BUSCEMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY and SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Yoder et al
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Lieutenant Yoder, C.O. Lazicki and Hearing Examiner Yodis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY M-BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
