Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bunton v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv01777
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Bunton
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bunton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2012cv00202
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Bunton
Respondent:
State of Texas, 253rd Judicial District Court, Liberty County, TX, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronald Bunton v. Michael LaForge, et al
as 11-40162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE BUNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LAFORGE, JANET PAULOCK, SUSAN SIMMONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-50021
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00920
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bunton v. LaForge et al
as 1:2010cv00750
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Bunton
Defendant:
Michael LaForge, Janet Paulock, Susan Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Bunton v. Susan Simmons, et al
as 10-20147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE BUNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN SIMMONS, MARK CRUSE, WILLIAM YORK and others
Bunton v. Simmons et al
as 4:2009cv04035
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Bunton
Defendant:
Susan Simmons, Mark Cruse, William York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunton v. Mgmt Training, et al
as 09-10142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE BUNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MANAGEMENT, TRAINING, AND CORPORATION (MTC), HASKINS and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Pardons and Paroles Division
Bunton v. Management, Training, and Corporation (MTC) et al
as 2:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Bunton
Defendant:
Management, Training, and Corporation (MTC), NFN Haskins and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Pardons and Paroles Division
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
