Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dixon v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Incorporated et al
as 3:2023cv21111
Plaintiff: Ronnie Dixon
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00708
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Ronnie Dixon
as 20-13527
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: In re: RONNIE DIXON
Dixon v. United States of America
as 8:2020cv00158
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Ronnie Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01880
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. Ronnie Dixon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-10952
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RONNIE DIXON, a.k.a. Ronnie Dickson, a.k.a. Ronald Wilks, a.k.a. Ronald C. Dixon, a.k.a. Ronald E. Moore, Jr.
Dixon vs. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv01832
Plaintiff: Ronnie Dixon
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Ronnie Dixon
as 16-12367
Petitioner: In re: RONNIE DIXON
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dixon v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2014cv00406
Petitioner: Ronnie Dixon
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BALLARD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02244
Plaintiff: HOWARD BALLARD , DWILDA BALLARD , MICHAEL BASNIGHT and others
Defendant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC., NFL PROPERTIES, L.L.C., RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?