Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hughes v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
. Maloney, . Renfro, . Geotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Root et al
as 2:2023cv02236
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
Jim Root, . Belcher, R.N. . Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deviner v. Root et al
as 2:2023cv02225
Plaintiff:
Leland Deviner
Defendant:
Jim Root, Macon County Sheriff Department, Jefferey Hockaday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dao Health v. Shenzhen Lutejiacheng Technology Co., Ltd.
as 1:2023cv04885
Defendant:
Shenzhen Lutejiacheng Technology Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Root E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Dao Health
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Root et al v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq02810
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Edward Root and Doris Root
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Buck v. Gordy et al
as 2:2022cv02249
Plaintiff:
Marty Buck
Defendant:
Chad Gordy, Jim Root and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kramer v. Rehmann et al
as 2:2022cv02149
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kramer
Defendant:
Tomika Rehmann and Jim Root
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Garner v. Flannery et al
as 2:2022cv02127
Plaintiff:
Brent A Garner
Defendant:
Scott Flannery, Tomika Rehmann, Corey Maloney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
