Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Casey v. Blue Knight Holdings, LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mandy Rose Casey
Defendant:
Blue Knight Holdings, LLC, Blue Knight Security, LLC, Caribou County Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Warren v. Fleming, et al.
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Thomas Aaron Warren
Defendant:
Rose Fleming, Idaho Department of Corrections, Camilla Cafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velox Media, LLC v. The Million Roses, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Velox Media, LLC
Counter Claimant:
The Million Roses, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Warren, et al. v. Wasden, et al.
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jennifer A. Warren and Shandry Rose
Defendant:
Lawrence Wasden, Boise Police Department, Ada County Prosecutors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collinson v. Rose et al
as 1:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Cory Allan Collinson
Defendant:
Haley Jean Rose, Idaho Department of Corrections, Mikayla Desjarlais and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonning v. Jesspen
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Amy Rose Bonning
Defendant:
Dave Jesspen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lozon v. USA
as 2:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
Brian Rose Quil-Quil-Poo Lozon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rose v. The United States
as 4:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Dana L Rose
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonning v. Bartlett, et al.
as 1:2021cv00245
Respondent:
Ada County Sheriff Stephen Bartlett, Governor Brad Little, Judge Steven Hippler and others
Petitioner:
Amy Rose Bonning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oceans Rose v. Community Outreach Behavioral Services
as 1:2021cv00198
Defendant:
Community Outreach Behavioral Services
Plaintiff:
Oceans Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
