Cases 1 - 10 of 34
(PC) Ramirez v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, E. McDaniel, Mehta Anand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Bolbol et al v. Rowell Ranch Rodeo, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01652
Plaintiff:
Deniz Bolbol and Joseph P. Cuviello
Defendant:
Rowell Ranch Rodeo, Inc., Hayward Area Recreation and Park District, Kevin Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Samantha Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04956
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
(HC) Rowel v. Martinez
as 1:2022cv00515
Petitioner:
Samuel D. Rowel
Respondent:
L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowel v. Martinez
as 4:2022cv01711
Petitioner:
Samuel D. Rowel
Respondent:
Warden L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2021cv05530
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bailey, Deneice Campbell, Jayda Chisolm and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Rowell v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01141
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Rowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowell v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv01743
Plaintiff:
Gail Rowell
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander Drake v. Assurance IQ, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06661
Defendant:
Michael Rowell and Assurance IQ, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Drake
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
