Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nanclares et al v. RPM Mortgage, Inc.
as 4:2016cv07188
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nanclares , Carl Knecht , David Glaser and others
Defendant:
RPM Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Bell et al
as 2:2016cv00844
Plaintiff:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Allstate Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bell, Megan Bell, RPM Mortgage Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank v. RPM Mortgage, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05534
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for AmTrust Bank
Defendant:
RPM Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RPM Mortgage, Inc. v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03380
Plaintiff:
RPM Mortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. RPM Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02475
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
RPM Mortgage, Inc. and Erwin Robert Hirt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
United States of America et al v. RPM Mortgage Inc
as 2:2014cv01109
Plaintiff:
United States of America and TJ Gallo
Defendant:
RPM Mortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Rozanna Avetyan v. RPM Mortgage, Inc., et al
as 12-56284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROZANNA AVETYAN
Defendant:
RPM MORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., RICHARD MARTINEZ, an individual, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and others
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. v. NL Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv03570
Plaintiff:
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
Defendant:
NL Inc. and RPM Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rozanna Avetyan v. RPM Morgage Inc et al
as 2:2012cv03085
Plaintiff:
Rozanna Avetyan
Defendant:
Todd Breachtenbach, CR Title Services Inc, CitiMortgage Inc and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
