Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Goding v. Saaranen et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dean Anthony Goding and Dean Goding
Defendant:
Keith Raffaelli, Kevin Coppo, Anthony Autio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKerchie #632622 v. Wrigglesworth et al
as 1:2023cv01319
Plaintiff:
Michael D. McKerchie #632622
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew Bouck, Darin Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dykes-Bey #201541 et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
David Brintley #190678, William Rhymes #735129, Dwight Rivers #124935 and others
Defendant:
M. Brown, Kenneth McKee and Heidi Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2016cv13452
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard, Richard Baldwin, Kalen D. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Heidi Washington and Michael Eagen
Tucker #207829 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2014cv01153
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tucker #207829, James Calhoun #187246, Kenneth Clark #191632 and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin, Brad Purves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker #207829 v. Finco et al
as 1:2014cv01057
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tucker #207829
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin, Brad Purves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones #364868 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roosevelt Jones #364868
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Paul Eyke, Mandi Salmi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker #207829 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2013cv00823
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tucker #207829, James Calhoun #187246, Kenneth Clark #191632 and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin, Brad Purves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker #207829 v. Hoffner
as 1:2013cv00625
Petitioner:
Rudy Tucker #207829
Respondent:
Bonita J. Hoffner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
