Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dykes-Bey #201541 et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
David Brintley #190678, William Rhymes #735129, Dwight Rivers #124935 and others
Defendant:
M. Brown, Kenneth McKee and Heidi Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudy Tucker v. Randee Rewerts
as 19-1542
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN RANDEE REWERTS
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUDY TUCKER
Curtis Jones, et al v. Tom Finco, et al
as 17-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEWIS JONES
Plaintiff:
JAMES CALHOUN, KENNETH VANWAYNE CLARK, KENNETH VANWAYNE CLARK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM FINCO, Deputy Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC), MIKE MARTIN, Special Activities Coordinator (MDOC), BRAD PURVES, Dietician and Food Service Manager (MDOC) and others
Heard et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2016cv13452
Plaintiff:
Lamont Heard, Richard Baldwin, Kalen D. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder, Heidi Washington and Michael Eagen
Joseph Dunbar, et al v. Yvonne Rose, et al
as 15-2530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH GREGORY DUNBAR, BERNARD GOINES, JR., CARLOS WHITFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
YVONNE ROSE, Librarian, Individual and Official Capacity, M. SAGE, Classification Director, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MIchigan Department of Corrections and others
Tucker #207829 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2014cv01153
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tucker #207829, James Calhoun #187246, Kenneth Clark #191632 and others
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin, Brad Purves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker #207829 v. Finco et al
as 1:2014cv01057
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tucker #207829
Defendant:
Tom Finco, Mike Martin, Brad Purves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudy Tucker v. Dewayne Burton
as 14-2179
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUDY TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
DEWAYNE BURTON
Rudy Tucker v. Bonita Hoffner
as 13-2191
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUDY TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
BONITA J. HOFFNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
