Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RUSSO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00852
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOAN RUSSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'CONNOR v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2019cv03246
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-20, JESUS TREVINO, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. RUSSO et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
J. RUSSO, SHAW and TERRY O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 1:2014cv00675
Plaintiff:
TYLER JONES , DION L. SMITH , TANYA RICHARDS and others
Defendant:
COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
POYNTER v. RUSSO et al
as 1:2013cv01129
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. POYNTER
Defendant:
LINDA RUSSO and JACQUELINE SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSO v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01721
Plaintiff:
PAUL A. RUSSO
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, HUNT LEIBERT JACOBSON, PC, ANDREW BARSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SENKO et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 1:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SENKO , PATRICIA SENKO , ROBERT RALPH ANDREWS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639-EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST FUND et al v. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01424
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 639-EMPLOYERS PENSION TRUST FUND , JOHN GIBSON , PHILIP GILES and others
Defendant:
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC , DAVID A. RUSSO and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
SPEECHNOW.ORG et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2008cv00248
Plaintiff:
SPEECHNOW.ORG, DAVID KEATING, FRED M. YOUNG, JR. and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
