Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Heg et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2022at01118
Plaintiff:
Tracy Heg, Ram Duriseti, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Kristina Lawson, Randy Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hoeg et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2022at01119
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hoeg, Ram Duriseti, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Kristina Lawson, Randy Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hoeg et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2022cv01980
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hoeg, Ram Duriseti, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Kristina Lawson, Randy Hawkins and others
Not Classified By Court:
LeTrinh Hoang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mark McDonald et al v. Kristina D. Lawson et al
as 8:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
Mark McDonald and Jeff Barke
Defendant:
Kristina D. Lawson, Randy W. Hawkins, Laurie Rose Lubiano and others
Intervenor:
Emanuel McCray
Petitioner:
ACLU of Northern California and ACLU of Southern California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Lawson et al
as 3:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
M.D. Joe Dean Crawford
Defendant:
Kristina D. Lawson, Randy W. Hawkins, Laurie Rose Lubiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Christian Medical and Dental Association et al v. Rob Bonta et al
as 8:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Christian Medical and Dental Association and Leslee Cochrane
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Tomas J. Aragon, Kristina D. Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian Medical and Dental Association et al v. Rob Bonta et al
as 5:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Christian Medical and Dental Association and Leslee Cochrane
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Tomas J. Aragon, Kristina D. Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
