Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Span v. Haine et al
as 1:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Samuel Span
Defendant:
Ronald Haine, Jason, Jennifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Penning et al v. C.A.T. Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02241
Plaintiff:
Mark Penning and Vicki Penning
Defendant:
C.A.T. Inc., Ryder Truck Rental Canada, Ltd. and Alexandre Bourcier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 v. Does 1-423, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2022cv04039
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 and Ryder Clips Unlimited, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-423, As Identified in Exhibit 2, Aumbaram, miltacusa and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Williams v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 3:2022cv50177
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Williams
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
D D M Logistics Inc. v. Ryder System, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02197
Plaintiff:
D D M Logistics Inc.
Defendant:
Ryder System, Inc.
Ryder v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq00736
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Defendant:
Hillyer Ryder, Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
