Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Hill v. Acosta et al
as 5:2017cv00198
Defendant:
Roberto Acosta, Rachel Chapa, Stanton Hawkes and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Woods
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gino Carlucci v. Rachel Chapa, et al
as 17-50025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GINO CARLUCCI
Defendant - Appellee:
RACHEL CHAPA, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna, MR. NILES, Associate Warden, Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna, DR. M. SPRINGER, D.D.S. and others
Vauda Shipp, Jr. v. Zack Hawthorn, et al
as 16-41693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAUDA VIRGLE SHIPP, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ZACK HAWTHORN, Magistrate Judge, RACHEL CHAPA, FRANK LARA and others
Shipp v. Hawthorn et al
as 1:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Vauda Virgle Shipp, Jr
Defendant:
Zack Hawthorn, Rachel Chapa, Frank Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lammers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Lammers
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Rachel Chapa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlucci v. Chapa et al
as 3:2015cv00173
Defendant:
R. Arriola, Rachel Chapa, E. Dona and others
Plaintiff:
Gino Carlucci
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Carlucci v. Chapa et al
as 3:2015cv00166
Defendant:
R. Acosta, Rachel Chapa, Dr. Thomas, D.D.S. and others
Plaintiff:
Gino Carlucci
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Robles v. Chapa et al
as 3:2015cv00123
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa and Dr. Lin
HSA:
Dr. Acosta
Plaintiff:
Luis Robles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Chapa
as 3:2014cv00365
Defendant:
Rachel Chapa
Notice Only Party:
Jara Magdalena
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
