Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Jones v. McCormack
as 24-54
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAFAEL ARDEN JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
NED MCCORMACK
Jones v. McCormack
as 1:2023cv10522
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
Ned McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. McCormack
as 1:2023cv08296
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones
Defendant:
Ned McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. The Warden of OBCC
as 1:2023cv08295
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
The Warden of OBCC and Ned McCormack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv08313
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. Stewart
as 22-2105
Plaintiff:
Blackout Entertainment and DoeBoy Entertainment
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Sakir Stewart, Island Def Jam South, Island Def-Jam Universal and others
Jones v. Doe
as 22-2073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Officer Jane Doe, New York City Criminal Justice Coordinator
(HC) Jones v. Caputo
as 22-1130
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph Caputo
Jones v. The City of New York Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv02958
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
The City of New York Department of Corrections, Supreme Court Judge Clancy, Eli Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Jones v. Caputo
as 1:2022cv02041
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
Joseph Caputo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
