Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Desh Vegas, LLC et al v. AKR Events, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01809
Plaintiff:
DESH VEGAS LLC, INGENE CONSULTING LLC and Desh Vegas, LLC
Defendant:
AKR EVENTS INC, a foreign corporation, M RAVISHANKAR aka RAFIQUE, an individual, AR RAHMAN, an individual and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Turner et al v. Talukder et al
as 2:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
William H Turner and Darryl Bryant
Defendant:
Samiur Rahman Talukder, Nya Bent, Anihi Newco LLC dba Avail Car Rental and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Onemata Corporation v. Rahman et al
as 2:2023cv00785
Plaintiff:
Onemata Corporation
Defendant:
Ashfaq Rahman, Sabira Arefin, MaskGene LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bonnie & Claus Inc. v. Rahman
as 2:2021cv01837
Plaintiff:
Bonnie & Claus Inc.
Defendant:
Imran Rahman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01334
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rahman v. USA
as 2:2011cv01966
Petitioner:
Najeeb Rahman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rahman et al v. Deutsche Bank National Company
as 2:2009cv00571
Plaintiff:
Sherry Rahman, Rehman Jamil and Faisal Rahman
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin & Allison, Ltd. v. Rahman et al
as 2:2007cv01575
Plaintiff:
Martin & Allison, Ltd. and Martin & Allison, Ltd.
Defendant:
Begum Rahman, American Medical Response, Inc., Horizon Specialty Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
