Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brad Warrington v. Rocky Patel Premium Cigars, Inc., et al
as 22-12575
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRAD WARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellant:
ROCKY PATEL PREMIUM CIGARS, INC. and RAKESH PATEL
PATEL v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
RAKESH PATEL
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK B GARLAND, TRACY RENAUD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Warrington v. Patel et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brad Warrington
Defendant:
Rakesh Patel and Rocky Patel Premium Cigars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warrington v. Patel et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Brad Warrington
Defendant:
Rakesh Patel and Rocky Patel Premium Cigars, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Callejas Olguin v. AUM Pelham LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00138
Defendant:
AUM Pelham LLC and Rakesh Patel
Plaintiff:
Maria Yuridia Callejas Olguin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PATEL v. INCH
as 4:2020cv00023
Petitioner:
Rakesh Patel and RAKESH K PATEL
Respondent:
Secretary MARK S INCH and MARK S INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roor International BV et al v. DNR USA Corp. et al
as 6:2019cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sream, Inc. and Roor International BV
Defendant:
DNR USA Corp. and Rakesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Espinosa v. AUM Enterprises, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Manuel Espinosa and Manuel Espinosa
Defendant:
AUM Enterprises, Inc and Rakesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Medere et al v. Indian Tabac - Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00701
Plaintiff:
Ryan Medere, Lewis Koehler and Michael Shrock
Defendant:
Indian Tabac - Company, Inc. and Rakesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gaitan v. AUM Enterprises,Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00131
Plaintiff:
Victor Gaitan and Victor Gaitan
Defendant:
AUM Enterprises,Inc., AUM Enterprises,Inc. and Rakesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
