Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Torres v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 24-514
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEXANDER TORRES
Defendant / Appellant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JIMMIE GATES, No. 111207 and others
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18834
Plaintiff:
RALPH SALAZAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alexander Torres v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2022cv07450
Plaintiff:
Alexander Torres
Defendant:
Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Jimmie Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Desiree Martinez v. City of Clovis, et al
as 22-16335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESIREE MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLOVIS, SANGER CITY, CHANNON HIGH and others
Desiree Martinez v. City of Clovis, et al
as 22-15087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESIREE MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CLOVIS, SANGER CITY, CHANNON HIGH and others
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07263
Plaintiff:
RALPH SALAZAR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ralph Salazar v. Navient Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00763
Defendant:
Navient Solutions, Inc. and Navient Solutions, LLC f/k/a Navient Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ralph Salazar
Desiree Martinez v. City of Clovis, et al
as 17-17492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESIREE MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLOVIS, SANGER CITY, CHANNON HIGH and others
Martinez v. City of Clovis, et al.
as 1:2015cv00683
Defendant:
City Of Clovis, Sanger City, Channon High and others
Plaintiff:
Desiree Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00811
Plaintiff:
Ralph Salazar
Defendant:
The City of New York , Detective Salvador and Police Officers John Does # 1-15
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
