Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Ralph Lingo v. Warden III, et al
as 15-14471
Petitioner - Appellant:
RALPH WILSON LINGO
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN III and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Lingo v. Corizon Healthcare Inc et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00583
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant:
Corizon Healthcare Inc, Nurse Parker, Nurse Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lingo v. Forniss et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00297
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lingo v. Forniss et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2013cv00345
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant:
Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lingo v. Forniss et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant:
Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lingo v. Forniss, et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2012cv00810
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant:
Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lingo v. United States of America, et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2011cv00340
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant:
United States of America, Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ralph Lingo v. Andy Hughes, et al
as 10-14614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH WILSON LINGO
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDY HUGHES, Sheriff, KEITH REED, Jail Administrator of Houston County and JASON SMOKES, Physician's Medical Assistant
Lingo v. Hughes et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2010cv00752
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant:
Andy Hughes, Keith Reed and Jason Smokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
