Cases 11 - 20 of 109
USA v. David Ramirez
as 22-1656
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JUSINO RAMIREZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv17414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. et al v. ELKHOLY, M.D. et al
as 3:2021cv16255
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
WAEL ELKHOLY, M.D., PRECISION PAIN & SPINE INSTITUTE, L.L.C., PRECISION SPINE & SPORTS MEDICINE OF NEW JERSEY, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Zonia Lopez-Ramirez, et al v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2118
Petitioner:
FRISDY MARIBEL MORALES-LOPEZ and ZONIA MARIBEL LOPEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jamie Ayala Ramirez v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1623
Petitioner:
JAMIE HERIBERTO AYALA RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Frank Nunez-Ramirez v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1428
Petitioner:
FRANK ANTHONY NUNEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Yessica Molina-Ramirez v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1314
Petitioner:
YESSICA FERNANDA MOLINA-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Herrera-Ramirez et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv00197
Defendant:
Loren Miller, Connie Nolan, Laura Zuchowski and others
Plaintiff:
DGH and Ana K. Herrera-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Amando Ramirez-Castaneda v. Attorney General United States
as 20-3352
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
AMANDO RAMIREZ-CASTANEDA
NUNEZ RAMIREZ v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv05593
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM P. BARR, JAMES R. MCHENRY, CHAIRMAN DAVID H. WETMORE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK NUNEZ RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
