Cases 21 - 30 of 437
Ramirez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08400
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Ramirez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08398
Plaintiff:
Lupe S Ramirez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Linda Ramirez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espericueta Ramirez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Janet Ariana Espericueta Ramirez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez #147145 v. Pima County Jail
as 4:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Ramirez
Defendant:
Pima County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kirk et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Kashane Kirk, Sharon Roberts and Brittnie Turner
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Michael Sullivan, Autumn Ladines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramirez v. Arizona Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Briana Aurella Ramirez
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
