Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Sylve v. Uyematsu et al
as 2:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Cheyanne Sylve
Defendant:
Carly Rose Uyematsu and Samuel Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quezada vs U.S. Government
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Denise Ramirez Quezada
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riggs v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riggs
Defendant:
Ramirez, Baker and Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Social Security
as 2:2023cv01885
Plaintiff:
Veronica Theresa Ramirez
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ramirez v. Curry et al
as 2:2023cv01842
Plaintiff:
Mitereo Ramirez
Defendant:
Curry, Walden, Brian Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Garza v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Garza
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, D. Southworth, Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez-Hernandez v. Cardenas Markets, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Monica Ramirez-Hernandez
Defendant:
Cardenas Markets, LLC and Lamanza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramirez v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Irma Ramirez
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical LLC and William Cook Europe APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
