Cases 1 - 10 of 234
Santos-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-1396
Petitioner:
JUNNIOR ALEXANDER SANTOS-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant:
LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party:
FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
Raby v. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10761
Plaintiff:
Gerald Raby
Defendant:
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. f/k/a NewHold Investment Corp., Peter George, Mario Ramos and others
Cruz-Vazquez v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) et al
as 3:2023cv01578
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Cruz-Vazquez
Defendant:
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), US Department of Homeland Security, Hon. Alejandro N. Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ramos-Cruz v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 3:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL M RAMOS CRUZ, Domingo Emmanuelli-Hermandez, Antonio Lopez Figueroa and others
Defendant:
Domingo Emanuelli, Antonio Lopez, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Ramos-Gutierrez v. Garland
as 23-1885
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN RAMOS-GUTIERREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Perez-Arritola v. Plaza de Diego, S.E. et al
as 3:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Mr. David J Perez-Arritola and David J. Perez-Arritola
Defendant:
Plaza de Diego, S.E., Carlos L Garca-Muiz, Garca-Sol Conjugal Partnership and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
