Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Schultz v. State of New York
as 11-4894
Plaintiff:
Doug Bersaw, New Hampshire, Amanda Moore, South Carolina, Arthur Groveman, Florida and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert L. Schulz, New York and John Liggett, New York
Defendant:
State of New Hampshire, State of South Carolina, State of Florida and others
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, Douglas Kellner, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Board of Elections, Evelyn Aquila, individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Board of Elections and others
Praileau v. The County of Schenectady et
as 11-4211
Plaintiff:
A.M.P., infant, Y.A.P., infant, A.A.P., infant and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Praileau, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Schenectady, a municipal entity, Timothy M. Mell, Police Officer, William Gallop, Police Officer and others
Praileau v. County of Schenectady
as 10-4322
Plaintiff:
A.M.P., infant, Y.A.P., infant, A.A.P., infant and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Praileau, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Schenectady, a municipal entity, Timothy M. Mell, Police Officer, William Gallop, Police Officer and others
Praileu et al v. The County of Schenectady et al
as 7:2009cv00924
Plaintiff:
William Praileu, A.M.P., Y.A.P. and others
Defendant:
The County of Schenectady, Timothy M. Mell, William Gallop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
